Talk:QTGMC 3.32 source
From Avisynth wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Raffriff42 (Talk | contribs) m (** bump **) |
Raffriff42 (Talk | contribs) (expanded my first post for clarity) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==== What's the best way to upload script source code ==== | ==== What's the best way to upload script source code ==== | ||
| − | * Method 1: | + | * Method 1: upload file as a Media resource.<br> |
| − | * Method 2: | + | * Method 2: create a new standard page, paste code in PRE block.<br> |
| − | I'm not sure. For some recent uploads, I went with Method | + | I'm not sure. For some recent uploads, I went with Method 2 without thinking too much about it. Now I see Method 1 has been used previously for script uploading. '''Oops.''' I can re-upload 'my' files if required. |
| + | |||
| + | In Method 2's defense, I think it's easier to track revisions with the standard Wiki history tools. | ||
| + | *Look at [[File:ChubbyRain.avsi]] for example. It has been updated several times. Can you see the changes, easily? | ||
| + | *In contrast, look at [[Caf_source]] - you can track all the changes using the History tab. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For another thing, note how the Method 2 files are displayed more compactly in [[:Category:Script_source]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | There may be other factors which I haven't considered. Thoughts? <br>[[User:Raffriff42|Raffriff42]] 15:10, 12 November 2015 (CET) | ||
:Bump to bring to top of the changelog. Sorry about flooding it over the last few days. I'm done for a while. [[User:Raffriff42|Raffriff42]] 22:36, 12 November 2015 (CET) | :Bump to bring to top of the changelog. Sorry about flooding it over the last few days. I'm done for a while. [[User:Raffriff42|Raffriff42]] 22:36, 12 November 2015 (CET) | ||
| + | :Expanded my first post to clarify a bit. [[User:Raffriff42|Raffriff42]] 04:52, 13 November 2015 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 04:52, 13 November 2015
What's the best way to upload script source code
- Method 1: upload file as a Media resource.
- Method 2: create a new standard page, paste code in PRE block.
I'm not sure. For some recent uploads, I went with Method 2 without thinking too much about it. Now I see Method 1 has been used previously for script uploading. Oops. I can re-upload 'my' files if required.
In Method 2's defense, I think it's easier to track revisions with the standard Wiki history tools.
- Look at File:ChubbyRain.avsi for example. It has been updated several times. Can you see the changes, easily?
- In contrast, look at Caf_source - you can track all the changes using the History tab.
For another thing, note how the Method 2 files are displayed more compactly in Category:Script_source.
There may be other factors which I haven't considered. Thoughts?
Raffriff42 15:10, 12 November 2015 (CET)
- Bump to bring to top of the changelog. Sorry about flooding it over the last few days. I'm done for a while. Raffriff42 22:36, 12 November 2015 (CET)
- Expanded my first post to clarify a bit. Raffriff42 04:52, 13 November 2015 (CET)
